Re:Why HackerRank and other coding tests are ageist
by mindcrime on Wednesday September 06, 2017 @09:52AM
(#15183632)
Fair point, but consider that software engineering is a MUCH younger profession than, say, accounting. Consider that "double entry book-keeping" dates back to around 1340, and accounting in general is even older than that.
We've had about 60 years to figure this stuff out, and arguably the ground is always moving beneath our feat as the nature and scope of the systems we build keeps changing.
I'm exhausted and frustrated with the field as it exists just now.
Likewise, but I'm not sure what choice we have, except to hope Ray Kurzweil is right about some of this life extension ideas. If we can survive another 300-400 years, maybe things will be better.
Re:Why HackerRank and other coding tests are ageist
by pc86 on Wednesday September 06, 2017 @11:59AM
(#15184661)
I'm not sure of anything, but if I had to pick one thing to bet on it would be that none of us, or our children's children['s children] will be here in 400 years.
Re:Why HackerRank and other coding tests are ageist
by icebraining on Wednesday September 06, 2017 @10:21AM
(#15183890)
There are many jobs like that; it's not hard to some Java shop maintaining some CRUD software for over a decade, with no signs of switching. Hell, a colleague of mine just got a decent offer to develop in Informix 4GL.
I'm exhausted and frustrated with the field as it exists just now.