News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Show HN: Ice – WSGI microframework to develop small web a... by giancarlostoro on Wednesday September 06, 2017 @08:08AM (#15182964)
I just use CherryPy. It can run under WSGI, be a host for WSGI applications (and is usually used to host Flask applications) and runs it's own web server as well. CherryPy is pretty decent and performant, both Hulu and Netflix use it internally or have in the past. I do know one of the main devs is trying to make it support more of the asyncio stuff, though that might be a while.

To answer your question as to "why WSGI?" the point is that if you write code that targets WSGI, no matter what you can put your Python code behind any WSGI compliant server. You wont be screwed because you picked a dying framework.

Re:Show HN: Ice – WSGI microframework to develop small web a... by sametmax on Wednesday September 06, 2017 @10:24AM (#15183914)
Yes but we have plenty of solutions for those. It's 2017, we got WSGI right. It's a done deal. Like trying to create another CGI framework.
Re:Show HN: Ice – WSGI microframework to develop small web a... by giancarlostoro on Friday September 08, 2017 @08:31PM (#15204935)
I'm for WSGI, just stating that there are frameworks that fully support it properly as both hosts and end points for it.