News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on WinBtrfs – A Windows driver for the next-generation Linux filesystem Btrfs. Parent comment

Re:WinBtrfs – A Windows driver for the next-generation Linux... by boondaburrah on Tuesday September 05, 2017 @05:11PM (#15179155)
Sadly, exFat doesn't work reliably on Windows as I've had random software fail when data is stored on a drive formatted with exFat.

Mostly that's the software's fault, mistakenly assuming anything "not NTFS" is FAT32 and insisting I need to "upgrade" my drives, even though I'm only using it as project storage.

I honestly don't know why user mode software can tell what format the volume is in, and wouldn't just expect the OS to handle it or provide various feature flags like VOLUME_SUPPORT_LARGE_FILES or so.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:WinBtrfs – A Windows driver for the next-generation Linux... by fooker on Tuesday September 05, 2017 @05:35PM (#15179319)
'Random software' should not know anything about which file system your drive has. If it does (..say.. some kind of whole disk backup utility), and you are using an unexpected file system that is not really a problem in exFat.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:WinBtrfs – A Windows driver for the next-generation Linux... by tinus_hn on Tuesday September 05, 2017 @07:53PM (#15180047)
The details can easily leak, for instance with FAT in the limited resolution for timestamps or the case (in)sensitivity.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:WinBtrfs – A Windows driver for the next-generation Linux... by Spivak on Tuesday September 05, 2017 @06:55PM (#15179772)
Just a simple counterexample, SQLite is not supported on NFS. Applications are not as insulated from the underlying storage as you suggest.
[ Parent | on HN ]