Re:Wind Energy Is One of the Cheapest, and It's Getting Cheaper
by beobab on Tuesday September 05, 2017 @05:41AM
(#15173702)
Although that would be a cool job description.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Wind Energy Is One of the Cheapest, and It's Getting Cheaper
by madcaptenor on Tuesday September 05, 2017 @11:44AM
(#15176319)
I'd really hope wind has a bus factor of more than one though.
Re:Wind Energy Is One of the Cheapest, and It's Getting Cheaper
by wojt_eu on Tuesday September 05, 2017 @10:20AM
(#15175432)
If we increase our energy consumption 100-fold this estimation of net loss in wind would approach 1% which sounds bad. I guess we might need wind protector after all.
Re:Wind Energy Is One of the Cheapest, and It's Getting Cheaper
by namarie on Tuesday September 05, 2017 @12:19PM
(#15176634)
That's a pretty big "if".
Re:Wind Energy Is One of the Cheapest, and It's Getting Cheaper
by CuriousSkeptic on Tuesday September 05, 2017 @05:18PM
(#15179204)
Is it? Given current energy consumption growth it's just 100-150 years away
Edit: From covering the entire surface of the earth, which is the bigger if. (Should have read the context)