Re:To Understand Rising Inequality, Consider Janitors
by gok on Sunday September 03, 2017 @02:32PM
(#15163011)
Nit: That 52.9% number isn’t quite right because you get to deduct your CA income tax against your federal income tax. So in practice even if you made a billion dollars in California, you’d pay $133M to the state then get federally taxed 39.6% on the remaining $867M, giving you an effective tax rate of about 47%.
Re:To Understand Rising Inequality, Consider Janitors
by cjlars on Sunday September 03, 2017 @02:33PM
(#15163016)
Good point, updated. It would be further impacted by AMT and the standard deduction thresh-hold, but that's a good estimate I think.
Re:To Understand Rising Inequality, Consider Janitors
by humanrebar on Sunday September 03, 2017 @04:56PM
(#15163860)
> we already have a defacto wealth tax in the US
We have actual wealth taxes, too, in the form of property taxes.
And more to your point, we already have a defacto wealth tax in the US because inflation is not deductible. If you hold a bond paying 2% per year, and inflation is also 2% per year, you pay tax on those gains even though you've made a post-tax loss in purchasing power. At 2% long term inflation, the defacto wealth tax works out to be the 2% multiplied by your capital gains rate, or from 0.47% to 0.74% for high earners depending on what state they live in.