Re:To Understand Rising Inequality, Consider Janitors
by conanbatt on Sunday September 03, 2017 @02:08PM
(#15162866)
Thats a terrible to reason to have or increase taxes. If you eliminated paper currency altogether in one fell swoop, the next day you would have another one replace it, be it bitcoin, gold or cigarettes.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:To Understand Rising Inequality, Consider Janitors
by pjmorris on Sunday September 03, 2017 @09:41PM
(#15165069)
Something underlies the value of bitcoin (proof of work), gold (rarity, utility, beauty, portability), cigarettes (addiction). Think through what underlies the value of fiat currencies like the US dollar. I'm with the chartalists [0]/Modern Monetary Theorists [1], believing that a government's ability to tax is the anchor for the currency's value.
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chartalism [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modern_Monetary_Theory
Re:To Understand Rising Inequality, Consider Janitors
by conanbatt on Monday September 04, 2017 @12:27AM
(#15165720)
Have barely scanned these articles, but even if I agreed that tax collection is what gives currency most of their circulatory value, thats no reason to have taxes, let alone making them higher.
Re:To Understand Rising Inequality, Consider Janitors
by pjmorris on Monday September 04, 2017 @05:10AM
(#15166805)
Something's got to circulate. There's not enough bitcoin+gold+barter-able commodities to go around, so fiat currency is necessary to the economy as it stands. If you agree that taxes give currency most of its circulatory value, you have to figure out what else would give it value if taxes were taken away.
Re:To Understand Rising Inequality, Consider Janitors
by conanbatt on Thursday September 07, 2017 @02:31AM
(#15189544)
there is more than enough bitcoin/gold/barterable commodities to go around.. they are divisible objects like any other. And any bank could run its own bank notes, as it was in the past.
Having taxes to have circulatory value sounds pretty dumb to me.