“Oracle laid off all Solaris tech staff in a classic silent EOL of the product”

Re:“Oracle laid off all Solaris tech staff in a classic sile... by heybrother on Sunday September 03, 2017 @11:29AM (#15161916)

I don't know if it would've been any different for Solaris, but I can imagine Google would've been a whole lot better off owning Java. They probably would've been far better stewards too.

Even if they win Oracle v Google, it's been a huge distraction, a huge cost in lawyers (who knows how much they'll recoup), a big unknown and the search for an alternative has to be costly and time-consuming.

$8.3 billion almost seems like a bargain in hindsight.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:“Oracle laid off all Solaris tech staff in a classic sile... by kpil on Sunday September 03, 2017 @12:07PM (#15162157)

To be fair I don't think that Oracle have been particularly bad to Java, except beeing Oracle.

I doubt Google was ever an alternative. Realistically it was a fight for power over the enterprise customers between IBM and Oracle, with most (non OS) products built or integrated with Java.

Maybe it was even a hot potato- someone needed to keep their strategic bet alive, since Microsoft also share the same strategy in the enterprise app segment. (Sell complex but underperforming applications to ill-advised customers using long feature lists.)

[ Parent | on HN ]