Re:Read This Before You Build Uber for X
by mlamat on Saturday September 02, 2017 @01:41AM
(#15154507)
I would never lend my chainsaw to an another person.
If they don't own it, they won't take proper care for it.
Re:Read This Before You Build Uber for X
by sgift on Saturday September 02, 2017 @01:54AM
(#15154534)
These things tend to sort themselves out in sharing economies by word-of-mouth. If someone doesn't handle the things trusted to them carefully, no one will share with them anymore.
Re:Read This Before You Build Uber for X
by icebraining on Saturday September 02, 2017 @04:00AM
(#15154868)
I don't think the "no money" is necessary. For example, I don't think any drivers in Bla Bla Car do it professionally, since it's not really profitable if you're taking the trip just for the money.
I have the feeling that the large-scale implementations of sharing use this social interaction as a ground to grow small businesses which offer services to strangers. I'm okay with that, it makes everything more efficient and straightforward, but there's little left of the sharing part of the deal: Hey, why not use your car that would sit in the garage while you waste time to make extra few bucks -> lease a new car and work as not-taxi-driver. Have an empty apartment or go for vacation, let someone occupy it -> get a mortgage for 3 condos and run a totally-not-a-hotel. Tools collecting dust in the shed -> buy a few sets of commonly used powertools and lease it for $xx/day. Etc. "Sharing economy" now means that you cover all the expenses of running a business and share the revenue with the platform that brought you customers. There's very little actual sharing, but the economy works as usual.
I guess my point is: sharing works without intermediaries and there may be no money exchange to take a cut, "sharing" with the intent to make a profit inevitably leads to professionalization and requires the "sharer" to operate a regular business.