News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on ESPN Football Analyst Walks Away, Disturbed by Brain Trauma on Field. Parent comment

Re:ESPN Football Analyst Walks Away, Disturbed by Brain Trau... by mattm on Thursday August 31, 2017 @10:46PM (#15145738)
As a big hockey fan, I completely agree with this. The pads players wore 30+ years ago were pretty much nothing so if you tried to hit someone hard it hurt you as well. My theory is that the NHL would see less concussions if they reduced the padding but such a counter-intuitive process is never going to happen.

I'm curious, did Australian Rules Football go to padding and then remove it? Because I think that once padding is put in place, it's very tough to get people to remove it.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:ESPN Football Analyst Walks Away, Disturbed by Brain Trau... by takk309 on Friday September 01, 2017 @03:37PM (#15151757)
One big reason for padding that is not directly related to player-on-player contact is getting hit with the puck. I play in beer league hockey (non-check) as a defense man and I wear full shoulder and chest pads to protect from the puck, not hits from other players. At the pro level, taking a hit from a puck without padding could easily cause very severe injury.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:ESPN Football Analyst Walks Away, Disturbed by Brain Trau... by jackvalentine on Friday September 01, 2017 @09:41AM (#15148219)
AFL has never had padding.
[ Parent | on HN ]