Harvey Didn't Come Out of the Blue. Now Is the Time to Talk about Climate Change

Re:Harvey Didn't Come Out of the Blue. Now Is the Time to Ta... by dogruck on Wednesday August 30, 2017 @01:25PM (#15134073)

> Human CO2 contribution and the basic warming effect are well understood.

Could you please point me to your most convincing scientific argument, so that I can understand it too?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Harvey Didn't Come Out of the Blue. Now Is the Time to Ta... by terminus on Wednesday August 30, 2017 @03:00PM (#15134934)

The argument was right below the line you replied to. Perhaps try reading?

A google search for "case for climate change" would also give you meaningful results. But, you already knew that.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Harvey Didn't Come Out of the Blue. Now Is the Time to Ta... by dogruck on Wednesday August 30, 2017 @03:29PM (#15135164)

Sorry, I meant a convincing piece of scientific reporting. I did read your echo chamber babble.

What are your sources? Care to cite one?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Harvey Didn't Come Out of the Blue. Now Is the Time to Ta... by terminus on Wednesday August 30, 2017 @11:07PM (#15137888)

Ignoring the gratuitous insult, here's the NCA 2014 report (the report itself is about the impact of climate change; Chapter 2 lays out the case for climate change caused by humans. Citations are at the end of the chapter.): http://s3.amazonaws.com/nca2014/low/NCA3_Climate_Change_Impa...

There's also a web version where you can explore the highlights: http://nca2014.globalchange.gov/. The references are cited right there.

If you don't find this convincing, then I'd like to understand why. Also, if you don't trust this source (a US gov agency), I'd like to understand what kind of sources might you find more convincing.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Harvey Didn't Come Out of the Blue. Now Is the Time to Ta... by dogruck on Wednesday August 30, 2017 @01:35PM (#15134159)

I'll take each downvote as evidence that such an argument does not exist.

[ Parent | on HN ]