News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:24/192 Music Downloads Are Very Silly Indeed (2012) by justin66 on Wednesday August 30, 2017 @09:53AM (#15132126)
> Yeah, this is often true. Some of Green Day's (a band I've never previously been into) albums were released in 24/192 or 24/96 a few years back and they actually sounded really great, with real dynamic range.

Back in the day you'd occasionally see remastered "gold" discs released. The advertising made a big deal about the disc material. Those probably sounded different too (they managed to sell them at a great premium) but with those, they sounded better because of the newer remastering, not the disc technology.

It's certainly possible this is the case with some of those releases remastered for SACD as well. The label probably didn't give Green Day a huge amount of money for production when they made Dookie, for example, but it eventually sold 20 million copies and additional production made sense. If it sounds better to the listener it's a real benefit, too, but it is quite likely not down to the playback technology.

Two oddball things I've noticed about remasters in the last couple of years: there's some agreement out there that the newest remaster of Hendrix's records is not the best. And King Crimson, who has an audiophile following and decorates their catalog with remasters with alarming regularity, removed a little dynamic range (an oversimplification) from the newest remaster of Larks Tongues in Aspic when remastering the CD and mastering for DVD/A because people very understandably complained about the (technically very good) previous version being too quiet. Audiophiles say they want dynamic range, but...

Re:24/192 Music Downloads Are Very Silly Indeed (2012) by JohnBooty on Saturday September 02, 2017 @09:04AM (#15155767)
Yeah. And you know, as a casual audiophile, that's my big frustration with this hobby. There's so much bullshit marketing (and audiophiles who believe it) that it really gives the whole hobby a bad name. (On the bright side, there are a lot of objective audiophiles and with just a little bit of knowledge you can get fantastic sound for very little money...)

    The label probably didn't give Green Day a huge amount of
    money for production when they made Dookie, for example,
    but it eventually sold 20 million copies and additional 
    production made sense.
I don't know about Dookie but their latter albums were recorded with full dynamic range and then squashed down into loudness-wars style mush.
Re:24/192 Music Downloads Are Very Silly Indeed (2012) by tripzilch on Wednesday August 30, 2017 @04:44PM (#15135838)
Yeah it's still the artist's choice how much dynamic range is needed to express their music. More dynamic range just for the sake of it, seems just as bad as sausage flattening to get as loud sound as possible.