Treating performance as a product: The technical story of Asana’s rewrite

Re:Treating performance as a product: The technical story of... by pkaeding on Tuesday August 29, 2017 @02:55PM (#15126714)

I'm not the GP, but we went through a similar journey here, and after ditching Asana, we went to Todoist, which is nice in its simplicity (and fast). Sooner or later, the simplicity became too simple, so we switched to Clubhouse, where we are now. It is serving us well.

Presumably, one day, we will outgrow that, and need to go to JIRA (with all of its power and complexity), but it would be nice to delay that inevitable as long as possible.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Treating performance as a product: The technical story of... by ibrahima on Tuesday August 29, 2017 @04:49PM (#15127488)

Clubhouse is pretty sweet, I feel like it's basically Pivotal Tracker done right. Fast enough to not get in the way but flexible enough for most workflows. We're a pretty small company though, I don't know if something like JIRA becomes more necessary as the company scales.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Treating performance as a product: The technical story of... by spraak on Tuesday August 29, 2017 @04:20PM (#15127296)

We never used Asana, but moved from Trello to Clubhouse as well after we outgrew Trello's simplicity. Clubhouse has been awesome so far, and generally loads quickly

[ Parent | on HN ]