Re:Maybe today’s Navy is just not very good at driving ships
by KGIII on Monday August 28, 2017 @07:53PM
(#15121120)
There's an excluded middle, in that statement. De-emphasizing the importance may be an option.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Maybe today’s Navy is just not very good at driving ships
by cgmg on Monday August 28, 2017 @08:38PM
(#15121310)
Fair point. Let me rephrase the question:
Do you really think reducing standardised tests would improve the education system?
If so, what objective evidence can you provide for this belief?
Re:Maybe today’s Navy is just not very good at driving ships
by closeparen on Monday August 28, 2017 @10:30PM
(#15121691)
If you measure it less, you'll have a weaker argument for how the education system is doing!
Your comment is precisely the problem: objective metrics will always support their proponents' arguments for more measurement, while any upsides to a lessened objective grading will be difficult to show because they'll involve subjective assessment or less assessment.
Do not confuse the investigator's convenience in accessing a truth value for the truth value itself.
Re:Maybe today’s Navy is just not very good at driving ships
by andrewem on Tuesday August 29, 2017 @02:22PM
(#15126448)
That argument has been made many times and in great detail. See for instance the work of Diane Ravitch, former US Assistant Secretary of Education (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diane_Ravitch)
Edit: she was Assistant Secretary, not Secretary