Either

a) the token is redeemable, and in that case why buy securities you don't intended to use (speculation is the only reason) b) or the company folds before delivering and the token is worthless, so by selling it you are just pushing the loss to a greater fool

Either way, this is objectively worse than Kickstarter.

Let's say you give $50 to a kickstarter project, and in return you get some special benefit, say early access. If this was tokenized, as you follow the project, you could sell early access. If you thought it was less likely to happen, maybe you sell it for $40. If it was super exciting, and the founders capped how much early access there could ever be, maybe you sell at $60. This is the benefit that tokenization gives you. You don't get any say in the company, any stock, etc. - you get access to a product, and through the blockchain you can easily trade it securely and provably.

People who buy diamonds, physical diamonds, may be speculating on them. Others may actually like the diamond. For whatever reason, they bought the diamond, and now own it, and can resell it. It isn't illegal to buy something in the hope it goes up in value. People do that all the time with videogames, cars, whatever.

Now, let's say ownership of a diamond was moved to the the blockchain. Not only could you buy and transfer it easily, provably, securely - you could even buy 0.000000001 diamonds, or 100000 diamonds, just as easily.

In my opinion, all of this is objectively better than kickstarter.

>In my opinion, all of this is objectively better than kickstarter.

Sure, because you don't even have the little bit of oversight that kickstarter offers. In your case you can just keep pumping coins into the market while they have any meaningful amount of value. Then when they are worthless you just claim your project failed and take the money from selling the coins.

So do a kickstarter and offer a digital token in addition to whatever you claim to be offering, then the funder have a token to sell when they aren't happy or think you will fail to deliver. And I am not sure that is a selling point, "hey you have an immediately transferable token you can sell at floating prices on a secondary market, if or when you feel we won't deliver."

And what justifies these tokens you are offering having such a variable price? They aren't tied to the company equity or actual success of the company, but for your inability to launch when they would become completely valueless, in fact you claim they are a utility transferable for data but why would the price of the product/data being offered fluctuate other than speculation of a blockchain based crypto coin separate having nothing to so with the alleged utility.

> in fact you claim they are a utility transferable for data but why would the price of the product/data being offered fluctuate

The same reason the price of anything fluctuates. Do you think the price of mobile data should be different?

Do I think the price of mobile data should fluctuate before the company releases a data product on the market...no.

You can claim it's the same reason anything fluctuates, but point me to other products/goods/services with prelaunch fluctuating pricing.

For example the price of crude oil fluctuates. Corn, gas, electricity. Every commodity.

If mobile data becomes more of a commodity, it, too, will have a free-floating price.

This guy is claiming his coin isn't regulated because it is a utility to exchange for a product (that doesn't even exist, and may never exist). The rest of that stuff you mention may fluctuate in price, but its a direct price to the end consumer for the product, not a fluctuating price of a "token" to exchange for those products before they exist, but if that is what you are talking about, buying/selling "things" you can exchange for corn before the corn exists that sounds an awful lot like buying/selling futures contracts which is heavily regulated. Either way you would need to find an example that actually fits the facts.