News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Toyota Research Institute head says full autonomous drivi... by devmunchies on Monday August 28, 2017 @11:37AM (#15117247)
> a car misread a stop sign with a small amount of marking as a 45MPH speed limit sign

That's what happens when the sign were made for humans. They should start putting QR codes under traffic signs, with the human sign as a fall back or as a second point of reference.

Re:Toyota Research Institute head says full autonomous drivi... by cmurf on Monday August 28, 2017 @12:51PM (#15118038)
QR codes are a goddamn eyesore. I'm voting against any city counselor who thinks they're a good idea. Find another way.
Re:Toyota Research Institute head says full autonomous drivi... by nayuki on Monday August 28, 2017 @11:42AM (#15117309)
How can you verify at a glance that the QR Code associated with a human-readable sign is correct?
Re:Toyota Research Institute head says full autonomous drivi... by devmunchies on Monday August 28, 2017 @02:37PM (#15118957)
I said this in my comment: "...with the human sign as a fall back or as a second point of reference."

You wouldn't remove human sign identification from the algorithm, you just supplement it with the small QR code under the sign.

Re:Toyota Research Institute head says full autonomous drivi... by Eridrus on Monday August 28, 2017 @11:47AM (#15117368)
Not that I think QR codes are a good idea, but why does this property matter?

People can be dicks to each other in myriad ways, I don't find these arguments that you could trick self-driving cars super compelling.