Re:Toyota Research Institute head says full autonomous drivi...
by cmurf on Monday August 28, 2017 @12:51PM
(#15118038)
QR codes are a goddamn eyesore. I'm voting against any city counselor who thinks they're a good idea. Find another way.
Re:Toyota Research Institute head says full autonomous drivi...
by nayuki on Monday August 28, 2017 @11:42AM
(#15117309)
How can you verify at a glance that the QR Code associated with a human-readable sign is correct?
Re:Toyota Research Institute head says full autonomous drivi...
by devmunchies on Monday August 28, 2017 @02:37PM
(#15118957)
I said this in my comment: "...with the human sign as a fall back or as a second point of reference."
You wouldn't remove human sign identification from the algorithm, you just supplement it with the small QR code under the sign.
Re:Toyota Research Institute head says full autonomous drivi...
by Eridrus on Monday August 28, 2017 @11:47AM
(#15117368)
Not that I think QR codes are a good idea, but why does this property matter?
People can be dicks to each other in myriad ways, I don't find these arguments that you could trick self-driving cars super compelling.
That's what happens when the sign were made for humans. They should start putting QR codes under traffic signs, with the human sign as a fall back or as a second point of reference.