News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Breaking up the Container Monolith by Spivak on Sunday August 27, 2017 @11:01AM (#15111049)
That would lead to a small image size because you would just apply the .jar to a base Java install but it doesn't do anything for the container size because they all will have their own JVM copy.
Re:Breaking up the Container Monolith by IanCal on Sunday August 27, 2017 @11:11AM (#15111091)
I don't understand what you mean for the container size. If they share the same base layer it won't use more disk space to store than splitting it up, surely.
Re:Breaking up the Container Monolith by riskable on Sunday August 27, 2017 @04:30PM (#15112554)
You're missing the fact that if they're all using the same layer (base image) for the JVM all the images will be deduplicated (well, CoW) so you could have a hundred different apps and they would only use the equivalent of a single image for the JVM (in terms of storage).