News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Dreamwidth Banned by PayPal in 2008 for Refusing to Censor Users. Parent comment

Re:Dreamwidth Banned by PayPal in 2008 for Refusing to Censo... by sddfd on Friday August 25, 2017 @02:59PM (#15101205)
If CF was legally obligated to offer their services to them, such a claim wouldn't hold water.

I'm not saying CF /should/ be obligated to provide the service to everyone.

I'm just saying if they were, then speculation about any implied agreement would go away.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Dreamwidth Banned by PayPal in 2008 for Refusing to Censo... by ScottBurson on Friday August 25, 2017 @05:06PM (#15102255)
No business is legally required to serve customers who defame and disrupt their business. The law only requires that the same standard be applied to customers who happen to be members of protected classes as is applied to everyone else.
[ Parent | on HN ]