Re:Right to Privacy a Fundamental Right, Says Indian Supreme...
by vkrm on Thursday August 24, 2017 @03:56AM
(#15088380)
"Reasonable restrictions" are not very well defined in the Indian constitution. They are quite broad and open to interpretation on a case-by-case basis.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Right to Privacy a Fundamental Right, Says Indian Supreme...
by nileshtrivedi on Thursday August 24, 2017 @04:27AM
(#15088472)
Justice A.P.Shah panel had recommended principles for privacy which goes into quite a bit of detail. So there is a guiding light and not everything will be case-by-case basis.
http://planningcommission.nic.in/reports/genrep/rep_privacy....
Re:Right to Privacy a Fundamental Right, Says Indian Supreme...
by product50 on Thursday August 24, 2017 @04:18AM
(#15088440)
Can reasonable restrictions be put on fundamental rights as well? So you are suggesting that the right to life has reasonable restrictions -- that in order to be friendly to a foreign state, the nation state can murder their citizens?
Re:Right to Privacy a Fundamental Right, Says Indian Supreme...
by srean on Thursday August 24, 2017 @04:39AM
(#15088517)
> So you are suggesting that the right to life has reasonable restrictions
Please read what he said, he is not saying that, the thing he quoted is, and that thing I believe is the constitution as it stands now.
Re:Right to Privacy a Fundamental Right, Says Indian Supreme...
by thanksgiving on Thursday August 24, 2017 @04:30AM
(#15088492)
Sorry for being off topic but I believe fundamental rights do not and should not require a citizenship test. If we hold these rights to be fundamental, we must not be willing to tolerate violations of such rights of any person in our jurisdiction.
Re:Right to Privacy a Fundamental Right, Says Indian Supreme...
by vkrm on Thursday August 24, 2017 @06:57AM
(#15089059)
I'm not suggesting anything, the Constitution of India specifically allows for "reasonable restrictions". The right to life does have restrictions - the death penalty is still legal in India.