News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:D as a Better C by kevin_thibedeau on Thursday August 24, 2017 @12:32AM (#15087604)
Nim is not a Win32 runtime. It outputs strings to stdout. Any sane OS would do the right thing in 2017.
Re:D as a Better C by e12e on Thursday August 24, 2017 @11:51AM (#15091108)
I should perhaps clarify that "just use the win32 api" refers to on Windows. Just as one might use syscall 4/write() on Linux, if one doesn't want to/can use libc printf.

See also, for example:

https://stackoverflow.com/questions/15528359/printing-utf-8-...

https://stackoverflow.com/questions/26106647/c11-unicode-sup...

http://www.cprogramming.com/tutorial/unicode.html

Note; I'm not convinced using utf8 internally is a great idea - especially for a "beginner friendly" language. Playing with anything from palindromes to revise strings and character/grapheme counts and

  "d o u b l e  s p a c i n g"
strings can be fun learning exercises - that might be easier with a 32-bit (or even 64 bit) representation.

But no matter how you look at it, there's no such thing as "simple" handling of international text.

Re:D as a Better C by e12e on Thursday August 24, 2017 @02:49AM (#15088140)
I'm not sure how there can be "one true sane thing". There's more to strings than Unicode, and more to Unicode than utf8. In fact the os does pretty sane here - not checking for utf16 or utf32 isn't really great on Linux either (haven't checked how/if nim handles locales on Linux). Afaik, eg python3 does the right thing on Windows and Linux w/print(). It's just one of the many little things were one may whish for "one, simple, sane way" - but have to deal with the realities.

Same goes for things like handling paths, line endings for text files, resource forks (or not) for files, changing file meta-data...