Re:Lab tests: Why Consumer Reports can't recommend the iPhone 4
by SHOwnsYou on Monday July 12, 2010 @01:45PM
(#1508708)
I think to suggest that they are over reacting is peculiar when their history is so well known. They have been surviving for over 75 years based on their objective approach to rating consumer goods. In their attempts to be unbiased, they don't accept product sample or event print outside advertising. That means they have been surviving for 75+ years simply on their reliability.
I'd think suggesting they over reacted is quite a stretch, yes.
I'd think suggesting they over reacted is quite a stretch, yes.