Re:Machines Taught by Photos Learn a Sexist View of Women
by drewbuschhorn on Wednesday August 23, 2017 @06:03PM
(#15085616)
I think it comes down to people wanting AI to do what we say ought to happen, rather than what we actually do. I wish the solution was to fix what we actually do, rather than have to rejigger the data, but here we are.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Machines Taught by Photos Learn a Sexist View of Women
by mc32 on Thursday August 24, 2017 @12:57AM
(#15087686)
Isn't another difficulty found because different sets of populations exhibit different characteristics?
Young-Old, Tall-Short, Poor-Wealthy, Educated-Unschooled, ColdClimate-HotClimate, etc?
Re:Machines Taught by Photos Learn a Sexist View of Women
by drewbuschhorn on Thursday August 24, 2017 @10:09PM
(#15095609)
All your examples are characteristics, not preferences. The model gets the data 'there aren't many women in STEM (end of pipeline)' so it doesn't allocate resources to girls who are interested at the start of the pipeline. The prediction -> action cycle generates a self fulfilling prediction that winds up at a bad local minimum (maybe the model needed better leakyREU functions).
This is the same problem why your netflix recommendations just show you either the stuff everyone else is watching or the stuff super similar to the stuff you've already liked, it's hard to make predictions that are both novel and useful. There has to be room for exploring new domain space.