News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Why is this C++ code faster than my hand-written assembly (2016). Parent comment

Re:Why is this C++ code faster than my hand-written assembly... by gnaritas on Wednesday August 23, 2017 @01:51PM (#15083574)
Yes, it is.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Why is this C++ code faster than my hand-written assembly... by zerr on Thursday August 24, 2017 @01:11AM (#15087748)
I meant no more than ++x.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Why is this C++ code faster than my hand-written assembly... by gnaritas on Thursday August 24, 2017 @10:32AM (#15090389)
I know what you meant, I don't agree. Scour any large codebase, x++ is far more idiomatic than ++x.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Why is this C++ code faster than my hand-written assembly... by zerr on Friday August 25, 2017 @03:41PM (#15101563)
What about top C++ books? Also when it comes to advancing iterators...
[ Parent | on HN ]