News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:D as a Better C by Ace17 on Wednesday August 23, 2017 @12:45PM (#15082991)
That's not so simple, because large adoption at a too early stage causes the language definition to freeze before it reaches maturity.

Simon Peyton-Jones from the Haskell community explaining exactly that: "What happens if [a language] become successful too quickly? You can't change anything!" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=re96UgMk6GQ&t=1395

Re:D as a Better C by vram22 on Wednesday August 23, 2017 @02:30PM (#15083891)
Is this the same as what I've read of as the (humorous) Haskellers' motto: Anything but success! or Avoid success at all costs? or something like that? :) Meaning maybe that they do not want to dilute the purity of their language for industry success?

Edit: A quick google finds this, which is enlightening:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12056169