News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Winner-take-all effects in autonomous cars by ghaff on Tuesday August 22, 2017 @07:38PM (#15077260)
The liability question will be an interesting one--far more so than trolley problems IMO. There aren't a lot of examples where we just accept things sold to consumers killing people when used according to directions and properly maintained because "hey, sometimes stuff happens." Drugs are probably the best example. But even that isn't a case of your drugs killing someone else.

I do think it will figured out in some future where there's true autonomy and they're proven far safer statistically. But you're right that the general public isn't going to shrug when $AUTOMAKER's car runs over a skateboarder and the company says "We are committed to safety and we'll try harder next time."

There's also the uncanny valley when no one's paying attention although they're legally supposed to be.

Re:Winner-take-all effects in autonomous cars by 6d6b73 on Tuesday August 22, 2017 @08:01PM (#15077362)
>But you're right that the general public isn't going to shrug when $AUTOMAKER's car runs over a skateboarder and the company says "We are committed to safety and we'll try harder next time."

Unfortunately many examples from recent years (acceleration pedals, air bags, tires) show that after few weeks everybody will forget about the issue and move on.

Re:Winner-take-all effects in autonomous cars by ghaff on Tuesday August 22, 2017 @08:26PM (#15077504)
The general population may forget but, in the cases you cite, there were significant lawsuits in each case and settlements.