News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Initial Hammer2 filesystem implementation. Parent comment

Re:Initial Hammer2 filesystem implementation by gigatexal on Tuesday August 22, 2017 @12:03AM (#15069606)
Lol this is FUD. ZFS is easily tunable to not blow up and use all your ram.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Initial Hammer2 filesystem implementation by benchaney on Tuesday August 22, 2017 @02:09AM (#15070134)
Does "FUD" just mean "something I disagree with" now? How is this FUD?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Initial Hammer2 filesystem implementation by gigatexal on Tuesday August 22, 2017 @03:29AM (#15070384)
Spreading misinformation is what I was taking issue with not just disagreeing and making a stink about it like a troll might.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Initial Hammer2 filesystem implementation by JdeBP on Tuesday August 22, 2017 @04:06AM (#15070505)
You're not appreciating nor applying the fear, uncertainty, and doubt parts of "Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt".
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Initial Hammer2 filesystem implementation by gkya on Tuesday August 22, 2017 @06:25AM (#15071051)
Talking about downsides of a thing is not FUD nor making stink about it.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Initial Hammer2 filesystem implementation by snovv_crash on Tuesday August 22, 2017 @01:49AM (#15070043)
Depends if you want dedup.
[ Parent | on HN ]