News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Supreme Court asked to nullify the Google trademark by adwf on Monday August 21, 2017 @05:21PM (#15067956)
Doubt it will succeed. I use "hoover" when I'm actually using a Dyson. I'd never say I'm googling something when I'm actually using Bing.
Re:Supreme Court asked to nullify the Google trademark by jstanley on Monday August 21, 2017 @05:32PM (#15068028)
As a counter-anecdote, I often say I'm googling something when I'm actually using duckduckgo.
Re:Supreme Court asked to nullify the Google trademark by veneratio on Monday August 21, 2017 @05:35PM (#15068047)
I also do this, but that's because I work at Google and got tired of explaining to coworkers why I don't usually like the results from our search engine! Also, "I duckduckgoed that" doesn't roll off of the tongue very well.
Re:Supreme Court asked to nullify the Google trademark by JumpCrisscross on Monday August 21, 2017 @05:51PM (#15068122)
Coming to think of it, I too explain my searches on DuckDuckGo to colleagues as a "Google". Irrespective of the underlying reason, this gives merit to the plaintiffs' claim.
Re:Supreme Court asked to nullify the Google trademark by schoen on Monday August 21, 2017 @05:59PM (#15068161)
Maybe "I duckduckwent it"?
Re:Supreme Court asked to nullify the Google trademark by spraak on Monday August 21, 2017 @06:39PM (#15068364)
I'm surprised you'd not get culturally ousted for that? I know nothing about Google's internal culture, but I'd assume everyone would be against using someone else's product.
Re:Supreme Court asked to nullify the Google trademark by wutbrodo on Monday August 21, 2017 @07:15PM (#15068576)
> I know nothing about Google's internal culture, but I'd assume everyone would be against using someone else's product.

Your expectations make it sound like you've only worked at companies with terribly unhealthy workplace cultures. When I joined Google, I remember noticing that probably 50%+ of my coworkers used iPhones. That changed with all the free phones they gave out, but any place that would "culturally oust" you for not drinking the Kool-Aid sounds like a nightmare to work at.

Re:Supreme Court asked to nullify the Google trademark by veneratio on Monday August 21, 2017 @07:36PM (#15068671)
Google (as I've experienced it) is filled with normal, generally friendly folks. A few small jokes, but no cultural ousting. While I don't work in search (big company, many products), even the folks I know there recognize we need different tools for our job and sometimes Google search just isn't the way to go. I suspect if it were a more specialized company (say Tableau) then using a another company's tool for daily work might be frowned upon.
Re:Supreme Court asked to nullify the Google trademark by mywittyname on Monday August 21, 2017 @05:46PM (#15068103)
"duck it"
Re:Supreme Court asked to nullify the Google trademark by voidz on Tuesday August 22, 2017 @07:59AM (#15071497)
"Let me duck that for you"
Re:Supreme Court asked to nullify the Google trademark by spraak on Monday August 21, 2017 @06:37PM (#15068346)
I guess I like to advertise that I specifically use DuckDuckGo when I'm searching, so I purposefully say "I DuckDuckGo'd it" but it sounds terribly awkward :/
Re:Supreme Court asked to nullify the Google trademark by thnuoet5th on Tuesday August 22, 2017 @01:26PM (#15074552)
I wonder if this is a British thing? While Hoover is (or at least was) a very large and well-known vacuum cleaner brand in the states, I don't know anyone who says "hoover" to mean "vacuum cleaner." But I have heard it on British TV shows. (That and "Bic" to mean ball-point pen, apparently. Bic is mostly known for making extremely low quality razors in the US.)

I don't know anyone who literally means "Google" when they say to google something, though. They just generally mean search.