That's why I asked for links - I simply don't believe there has been even a single pro-white supremacy article.
Re:Who should be shamed, and who not?
by tedsanders on Monday August 21, 2017 @02:21PM
(#15066485)
I hesitate to comment because I don't think this conversation is productive. But I'll stray in. Your request for links is strange because Matt never said there were pro-supremacy posts. He said there were posts defending white supremacists. You have conflated the two concepts.
Defending the right to free speech for everyone is not the same as defending white supremacists, so it sounds like you are the one conflating two concepts.
Re:Who should be shamed, and who not?
by tedsanders on Tuesday August 22, 2017 @01:41PM
(#15074708)
My apologies if I gave you this impression. I only tried to clarify what was in Matt's post. I didn't think I was making any positive claims myself, but apparently I gave that impression. I'm sorry to have posted in this conversation and I wish I could delete my comment. I feel very sensitive to receiving downvotes.
I don't take "defending white supremacists" as defending their right to free speech or to assemble peaceable (which I support). I take it as defending them, which I don't.
I may be misinterpreting him for sure! That's part of why I asked.
Some people conflate defending the free speech rights of white supremacists as being pro-white supremacist.