News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Who should be shamed, and who not? by imron on Monday August 21, 2017 @01:25PM (#15066080)
> Dozens of pro-white supremacist articles? Please provide links.

Some people conflate defending the free speech rights of white supremacists as being pro-white supremacist.

Re:Who should be shamed, and who not? by pc86 on Monday August 21, 2017 @01:44PM (#15066199)
That's why I asked for links - I simply don't believe there has been even a single pro-white supremacy article.
Re:Who should be shamed, and who not? by tedsanders on Monday August 21, 2017 @02:21PM (#15066485)
I hesitate to comment because I don't think this conversation is productive. But I'll stray in. Your request for links is strange because Matt never said there were pro-supremacy posts. He said there were posts defending white supremacists. You have conflated the two concepts.
Re:Who should be shamed, and who not? by benchaney on Monday August 21, 2017 @02:38PM (#15066636)
Defending the right to free speech for everyone is not the same as defending white supremacists, so it sounds like you are the one conflating two concepts.
Re:Who should be shamed, and who not? by tedsanders on Tuesday August 22, 2017 @01:41PM (#15074708)
My apologies if I gave you this impression. I only tried to clarify what was in Matt's post. I didn't think I was making any positive claims myself, but apparently I gave that impression. I'm sorry to have posted in this conversation and I wish I could delete my comment. I feel very sensitive to receiving downvotes.
Re:Who should be shamed, and who not? by pc86 on Monday August 21, 2017 @02:23PM (#15066498)
I don't take "defending white supremacists" as defending their right to free speech or to assemble peaceable (which I support). I take it as defending them, which I don't.

I may be misinterpreting him for sure! That's part of why I asked.