Re:Bay Area as a City State
by waterlesscloud on Sunday July 11, 2010 @05:56PM
(#1506219)
Of course a bay area city state would vote to spend no money on the military industrial complex, and then an orange county city state would invade and conquer them.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Well, it seems that Singapore, as a model city state in that article, has much stronger military forces than many much larger and more populated countries.
Re:Bay Area as a City State
by jorgeortiz85 on Sunday July 11, 2010 @09:05PM
(#1506476)
I think waterlesscloud was alluding to the political preferences of Bay Area residents.
We would shut off OC's GPS access and their fleet of armed SUVs would be useless - they'd never make it beyond LA
Re:Bay Area as a City State
by SoftwareMaven on Sunday July 11, 2010 @06:15PM
(#1506261)
You don't have to turn off their GPS for them to get stuck in LA's gridlock and miss the invasion time. They are their own worst enemy.
Self-defense is cheap. Iraqis and Afghans seem to find a way to do a pretty impressive job without throwing buckets of money at the problem. (There's probably some significant outside funding in each case, but still.)