News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Bay Area as a City State by waterlesscloud on Sunday July 11, 2010 @05:56PM (#1506219)
Of course a bay area city state would vote to spend no money on the military industrial complex, and then an orange county city state would invade and conquer them.
Re:Bay Area as a City State by thingie on Sunday July 11, 2010 @06:11PM (#1506249)
Well, it seems that Singapore, as a model city state in that article, has much stronger military forces than many much larger and more populated countries.
Re:Bay Area as a City State by jorgeortiz85 on Sunday July 11, 2010 @09:05PM (#1506476)
I think waterlesscloud was alluding to the political preferences of Bay Area residents.
Re:Bay Area as a City State by zephjc on Sunday July 11, 2010 @06:05PM (#1506242)
We would shut off OC's GPS access and their fleet of armed SUVs would be useless - they'd never make it beyond LA
Re:Bay Area as a City State by SoftwareMaven on Sunday July 11, 2010 @06:15PM (#1506261)
You don't have to turn off their GPS for them to get stuck in LA's gridlock and miss the invasion time. They are their own worst enemy.
Re:Bay Area as a City State by natrius on Sunday July 11, 2010 @10:33PM (#1506595)
Self-defense is cheap. Iraqis and Afghans seem to find a way to do a pretty impressive job without throwing buckets of money at the problem. (There's probably some significant outside funding in each case, but still.)
Re:Bay Area as a City State by troels on Monday July 12, 2010 @07:10AM (#1507459)
Is military funded on a per-state basis in US? I would expect that to be a federal matter?