News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Ethereum Proof of Stake FAQ by CryptoPunk on Sunday August 20, 2017 @01:17AM (#15057058)
Proof of Stake was part of the original plan for Ethereum. Everyone knew going in that it would transition to it. The entire development team, not just Vitalik, has agreed to use ice ages to encourage the entire community to hard fork, to prevent orphan chains from emerging every time one of these planned changes is implemented.

It's unfair and inaccurate to describe the execution of a long-established plan that has been part of Ethereum since the beginning as some sort of nefarious plot being pushed through using manipulation.

Re:Ethereum Proof of Stake FAQ by Taek on Sunday August 20, 2017 @04:04AM (#15057442)
Does it really make sense to push an untested, highly criticized, and drastically different security architecture onto a live $20 billion system? Especially from a team that has a history of borking updates (Spurious Dragon)?

If there was an ounce of sanity here you'd at least have a 12 month trial period in an altcoin to iron out the kinks.

Re:Ethereum Proof of Stake FAQ by DoubleMalt on Sunday August 20, 2017 @04:33AM (#15057525)
Ethereum is the testing ground for Ethereum Classic ;)
Re:Ethereum Proof of Stake FAQ by nebabyte on Sunday August 20, 2017 @05:01AM (#15057592)
Ethereum is not the first coin to use PoS.
Re:Ethereum Proof of Stake FAQ by petertodd on Sunday August 20, 2017 @05:43AM (#15057696)
...and other coins using it have run into severe problems. For example, Peercoin had to add a system of centrally managed checkpoints to avoid nothing at stake attacks: https://github.com/peercoin/peercoin/blob/fbc81b380221e55c94...