Re:Ask HN: What's your spectacular burnout story?
by ZephyrP on Saturday August 19, 2017 @04:04PM
(#15055292)
I get the feeling that this is a really cool story but it's hard to see how any of these events relate to one another.
So your buddy PI slogs through a series of bad 'investigations', and is finally asked to do some work he initially enjoys but later procrastinates on. Wait though! It's all set because, surprise surprise, the as-yet-unmentioned baddie was faking the results all along!
I get the feeling that your last paragraph is supposed to be a stunning wrap up, but after some reflection I've concluded this is only because of the preexisting motif that everything after "and it turned out.." is a galactic burn.
Re:Ask HN: What's your spectacular burnout story?
by plaidfuji on Saturday August 19, 2017 @10:22PM
(#15056691)
I think the moral of this story is fundamental to all of academia: the sexier projects tend to rake in the grant money, even though they're less likely to succeed. The advisor didn't tell your buddy to do that project because he expected it to work, he told him to do it because he was seduced by the potential publishability of the result.
I see a lot of these burnout stories are about PhDs, and I've been there. The key to getting out is frequently to stop listening to your advisors. You're ready to graduate when you tell them what you're doing, not the other way around.
Re:Ask HN: What's your spectacular burnout story?
by codewritinfool on Saturday August 19, 2017 @07:36PM
(#15056213)
Sorry, I want to get this story but I don't. How did the buddy end up? How is he now?
The results till that day were modest at best, and that's because stabilizing the transition state is only part of what a real enzyme should do, and even though the professors are supposed to teach you this in your biochem/chemical biology deep-dive courses in grad school YMMV, and it's easy to sell a starry eyed grad student, especially when the prof doesn't know any better, too.
Anyways my buddy's project was even worse - he was supposed to make a protease (an enzyme that degrages proteins). And if you look at proteases, their clefts wrap around the protein even more than an antibody ever could (they have shallow clefts), because burying the reaction away from water is a critical aspect of their function.
He spent three years working in a lab that demanded 80+ hour workweeks. Towards the end his sleep cycle had flipped, he was playing around making geometric designs with his pipet tips, and spending much of his workday playing a flash website gameboy tetris, and many days going to the casino to play poker instead of work.
finally his boss modified his project, instructing him to graft a metalloprotease domain, onto the antibody in an attempt to get it working. A breath of fresh air! Suddenly he was invigorated with a new approach to the project. But not long after that, he was back to the old routine of being burned out, and totally unproductive, spending hours on trivialities, like trying to strip metals from his water supply to really get it right and get it working. In the end, it never worked.
It turned out that the metalloprotease domain was designed by Homme Hellinga. Years after this, the scientific community discovered that Homme Hellinga was faking his enzyme design work.