News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Google's stance on neo-Nazis 'dangerous', says EFF by brightball on Friday August 18, 2017 @12:09PM (#15047412)
Ehh...it's not so much controversial as it is just details that are normally left out. Once you're aware of them and take the time to verify the citations you immediately notice when other people leave them out.

Sure there were economic factors at play and those are interesting in their own right, but in the south the biggest thing that people fail to understand is the element of fear. I don't want to do a historic nose dive, but the 3 things you can read about to understand that better are The Haitian Massacre of 1804, John Brown, and The Cherokee Declaration of Causes.

Of those three, only John Brown is mentioned on the Wikipedia timeline. The other two provide context.

Re:Google's stance on neo-Nazis 'dangerous', says EFF by mantas on Friday August 18, 2017 @12:24PM (#15047556)
Thank you. Gotta add these to my to-read list!
Re:Google's stance on neo-Nazis 'dangerous', says EFF by brightball on Friday August 18, 2017 @12:44PM (#15047724)
You're welcome. The most important thing to remember is that this was a huge conflict with over 100 years of build up. There's a lot of complicated history that makes things ugly all around.

It's fascinating to read about though.

What I've found is the easiest way to find where there are holes that need to be explored is just by asking "Why?" anytime you hear of an event. If you're given history and just told, "this happened, then this happened..." the quickest way to get an answer to something is to simply ask "Why did they do that?"

That simple question will point you in the right direction more often than not. When you start answering enough of those questions, everything that happened makes a lot more sense.

Re:Google's stance on neo-Nazis 'dangerous', says EFF by mantas on Friday August 18, 2017 @02:26PM (#15048567)
Totally agree on that. This is how I approach my country's and surrounding region history.

Although it's popular to bash "there's no single truth" people, the more and more I look into history, the more I think that's true. Everyone has a very complicated history which is a product of what did or even didn't happen. Which results in totally different point of views and everybody see truth differently. It's truly fascinating to see how different timelines merge and separate and the today's politics and policies they cause.