If you're only in favor of eugenics when it's convenient - well, then you're in favor of eugenics.

Actually you can't mark Down syndrome elimination as eugenics, because Down syndrome sufferers are infertile (I guess) and thus unable to contribute in "-genics" either way.

I would say, Down syndrome elimination is anti-eugenics, because people with genetic predisposition for Down syndrome will provide more non-Down offspring.

Anyway, I've never seen any discussion about eugenics, except "the Bogeyman did it!" Eugenics aversion is something forced on the society from above.

Don't try to make your ignorance my problem. Go do some research. There's plenty of discussion out there, I promise.

Edit: I'm just going to leave you this because of your bogeyman comment. This is my hometown around the time my father was born. It's not about bogeymen. https://www.uvm.edu/~lkaelber/eugenics/NH/NH.html You're in your own for the rest though.

I've never saw anybody asking for my opinion on eugenics. So there's probably just a lot of echo-chamber monologues.