Despite Proven Technology, Attempts to Make Table Saws Safer Drag On

Re:Despite Proven Technology, Attempts to Make Table Saws Sa... by yladiz on Wednesday August 16, 2017 @11:29AM (#15028248)

Let's say the patent issue was rendered unnecessary (maybe courts require safety tech but also require the patent to be allowed royalty free) -- how much would this add to the cost of the saws? If the patent was still valid and they had to license it, are you sure it would add $200? The tech seems simple enough that I have a hard time believing a $400-ish saw becomes $600 due to this.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Despite Proven Technology, Attempts to Make Table Saws Sa... by sjs382 on Wednesday August 16, 2017 @11:55AM (#15028489)

The Reaxx is comparable (almost the same saw, just without the safety component) to the saw that I use (Bosch 4000-09) and IIRC it cost $1499 before the injunction, compared to the 4000-9's $600.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Despite Proven Technology, Attempts to Make Table Saws Sa... by yladiz on Wednesday August 16, 2017 @12:13PM (#15028655)

Wow, that's a 250% increase... I feel like that price is due to pricing the research into it rather than the cost of the actual product itself. Ideally if the tech becomes mandatory it won't be a significant increase.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Despite Proven Technology, Attempts to Make Table Saws Sa... by sjs382 on Wednesday August 16, 2017 @12:20PM (#15028719)

Ideally the price would be lower, yes.

I have a suspicion that the price increase is due to BOTH a need to recoup R&D and the perceived value of the "safe" saw.

[ Parent | on HN ]