Re:FTC says Uber took a wrong turn with misleading privacy, ...
by CaptainZapp on Wednesday August 16, 2017 @02:30AM
(#15025362)
I certainly agree with your comment, since it reflects my experience in a lot of cases. But
Why would such a statement legally cover your ass? From a legal perspective it sounds as dubious as warnings on a Truck "Stay back 10 metres. Truck is not responsible for damage"
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:FTC says Uber took a wrong turn with misleading privacy, ...
by 5706906c06c on Wednesday August 16, 2017 @12:44PM
(#15028949)
I can't disagree. However, it doesn't deter businesses from using it as it demonstrates intent to maintain certain security posture, regardless of how ill-conceived that posture might be. That said, the statement is touchy feely, and will more than likely not hold true in the court of law when pressure tested.