News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Ask a Female Engineer: Thoughts on the Google Memo by hackinthebochs on Tuesday August 15, 2017 @06:41PM (#15023397)
>Equally, if diverting more energy in to finding minority candidates is not lowering the bar for them then why would you need to divert more energy to find them? reply

The point is to find the ones that can pass at a higher rate than you normally would. No bar is lowered, and your representation increases.

Re:Ask a Female Engineer: Thoughts on the Google Memo by fche on Tuesday August 15, 2017 @08:06PM (#15023906)
If you search harder for them, the bar is lowered by virtue of letting them be less outstanding / noticeable.
Re:Ask a Female Engineer: Thoughts on the Google Memo by hackinthebochs on Tuesday August 15, 2017 @08:55PM (#15024116)
That doesn't follow if they're passing the same hiring process. It's not hard at all to get a contact for a phone screen with Google: I've been contacted by Google recruiters on linkedin with a barely filled out profile with one or two unremarkable positions listed. If you're counting the initial discovery phase as part of the hiring process, you're mistaken.
Re:Ask a Female Engineer: Thoughts on the Google Memo by fche on Tuesday August 15, 2017 @09:07PM (#15024183)
I believe the memo + followups included claims that the hiring process is not the same either.
Re:Ask a Female Engineer: Thoughts on the Google Memo by hackinthebochs on Tuesday August 15, 2017 @10:01PM (#15024406)
If that's the case, then yeah definitely a problem