I Bought a Book About the Internet from 1994 and None of the Links Worked

Re:I Bought a Book About the Internet from 1994 and None of ... by davehtaylor on Tuesday August 15, 2017 @02:04PM (#15020714)

I think it's fascinating the change in how we view site navigation. Another commenter gave a link to an old Microsoft site that had links all over the place. But for the most part, it seemed like sites started to standardize on navigation vertically on the left side. Now, we generally see them horizontally on the top, or in hamburger menus. But it's interested how that paradigm shifted. It seems like vertical side navigation would be more prevalent now, given how much wider monitors are.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:I Bought a Book About the Internet from 1994 and None of ... by SwellJoe on Tuesday August 15, 2017 @02:13PM (#15020799)

With wider monitors, my browser is actually narrowed. I split the screen in half and devote one half to the browser and the other half to a text editor and terminal. I used to have two monitors to do that, but now just one is fine, but the side effect is that I browse in a pretty narrow window. A narrow window also makes reading somewhat nicer on some sites, since it's harder to read very long lines of text.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:I Bought a Book About the Internet from 1994 and None of ... by at-fates-hands on Tuesday August 15, 2017 @02:23PM (#15020897)

>> A narrow window also makes reading somewhat nicer on some sites, since it's harder to read very long lines of text.

Curious to know how this works with ad-heavy sites. Do responsive sites display differently then too?

Been flirting with going to a single 32" monitor for a while. Just wondering if you think it's worth it with your experiences since I do development as well and have a similar setup (one monitor for editor and smaller laptop for browser/terminal) and would like to hear your input.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:I Bought a Book About the Internet from 1994 and None of ... by SwellJoe on Tuesday August 15, 2017 @02:43PM (#15021087)

I use an adblocker, so it's hard to know what ads do (though I disable it on some sites that I believe to be reasonably trustworthy about ads, and that I want to support, like reddit and some major newspaper sites; though I tend to pay for a subscription for sites that I really want to support and continue to block ads).

But, generally, it's fine. Most sites are entirely usable. There's a few that are quirky, but generally, modern websites are designed to scale down to tablets and phones, so they don't act too weird for a narrow lapptop/desktop browser.

I think the most common problem is sites that switch to hamburger menus at too high a resolution (so I get the mobile hamburger navigation on some sites, even though it's kinda silly looking and slightly less ergonomic). It's not super common, though. Most switch to hamburger a little lower than my browser width.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:I Bought a Book About the Internet from 1994 and None of ... by pault on Tuesday August 15, 2017 @06:20PM (#15023249)

I recently got the Dell 42.5" 4k monster (P4317Q), and while the dpi and color reproduction aren't good enough for serious design work, I'm able to divide my desktop into thirds for browsing and text editing. I usually keep a browser on the left, documentation in the middle, and a terminal on the right. I still get a little giddy when I turn it on every morning. What I really want is for apple to start producing 42" 8k "retina" screens, but I won't hold my breath. :)

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:I Bought a Book About the Internet from 1994 and None of ... by firmgently on Wednesday August 16, 2017 @11:51AM (#15028447)

I've used a media query in the past to make the menu horizontal along the top in a narrow window and vertical on the left in a wide one.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:I Bought a Book About the Internet from 1994 and None of ... by darpa_escapee on Tuesday August 15, 2017 @02:41PM (#15021070)

> given how much wider monitors are.

Monitors might be wider, but screens in general are much narrower.

[ Parent | on HN ]