>Wikileaks was actively campaigning for trump. Wikileaks came out and said they had "proof" clinton was a witch for christ's sake

I have not seen that. What I've read is that one of Podesta's leaked emails reference something along the lines of "spirit cooking" or whatever (and whatever that was code for) and some people outside WikiLeaks (obviously conspiracy theorists on the right) ran with that as evidence she (not even Podesta) was some kind of witch.

Regarding the spirit cooking: https://www.conservativereview.com/articles/wtf-is-spirit-co...

So, weird, but not witchcraft. Just the typical sort of performance art that I never understand. And the context of the email is there. Nobody was seeking out a "spirit cooking" experience. Just an invitation from an eccentric artist.

Ha! Well, thanks to Jane's Addiction, I think I know that better referenced as santaria.

Wikileak's twitter [1] literally linked to a website that says clinton is a satan worshipping witch.

[1] https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/794450623404113920?lang...

While I wouldn't go that far, but Wikileaks essentially consists of Julian at this point. And in my opinion he is a media whore so he will increasingly do whatever it takes to get that attention he craves. On the spectrum he is in the category of "Chaotic Me Me ME"

> but Wikileaks essentially consists of Julian at this point

It does not, which is how Wikileaks was able to keep publishing when the Ecuadorian embassy took away his internet access.