News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Give me 15 minutes and I'll change your view of GDB (2015... by pthreads on Saturday August 12, 2017 @07:31AM (#14997489)
>I still do, but I used to too.

I see what you did there. - Mitch Hedberg

Re:Give me 15 minutes and I'll change your view of GDB (2015... by user432468 on Saturday August 12, 2017 @10:33AM (#14998007)
Re:Give me 15 minutes and I'll change your view of GDB (2015... by kakarot on Saturday August 12, 2017 @08:23AM (#14997622)
If you are curious as to why you're being downvoted, it's because this comment adds no substance and states something completely obvious.

In other words, it was unnecessary. That kind of stuff is for reddit.

Re:Give me 15 minutes and I'll change your view of GDB (2015... by pthreads on Saturday August 12, 2017 @08:57AM (#14997714)
No, I am not curious. I know exactly why I am being downvoted.

HN'ers sometimes need to lighten up a bit. A little humor among thousands of serious comments (many not useful) is not going to bring down HN and it is incorrect to assume it doesn't add any substance. My comment was not crass, sarcastic, degrading or mean. It was appreciating the commenter's sense of humor in a harmless way.

Re:Give me 15 minutes and I'll change your view of GDB (2015... by jwilk on Saturday August 12, 2017 @11:05AM (#14998115)
There was no humorous value in your comment.

People who are familiar with Mitch Hedberg's work don't need any help in recognizing the quote.

For people who haven't heard about Mitch Hedberg, your comment doesn't make any sense without further research.

To me it sounded like you're bragging that you understood the reference.

Re:Give me 15 minutes and I'll change your view of GDB (2015... by dasil003 on Saturday August 12, 2017 @12:59PM (#14998720)
The comment tells you to go look up Mitch Hedberg, that's much more useful than further explanation since explanation is the death of humor.
Re:Give me 15 minutes and I'll change your view of GDB (2015... by nmg on Saturday August 12, 2017 @09:20AM (#14997794)
off-topic.
Re:Give me 15 minutes and I'll change your view of GDB (2015... by pmoriarty on Saturday August 12, 2017 @01:47PM (#14998943)
This is another example where HN needs tags.

The original humorous comment could have been tagged "humor" and the parent reply could have been tagged "meta", and an HN reader could have their client filter posts based on their preferences: if they want to see humor or meta posts, they could have them -- if they don't they won't and their feed will be leaner and less annoying to them, and there'll be less need to downvote "off-topic" posts.

Then everyone would be happy.

Re:Give me 15 minutes and I'll change your view of GDB (2015... by SimonPStevens on Saturday August 12, 2017 @03:12PM (#14999446)
I really like this idea.

[meta], [general-agreement], [non-contributing]

Re:Give me 15 minutes and I'll change your view of GDB (2015... by kakarot on Sunday August 13, 2017 @01:27AM (#15001666)
Until people spam the non-contributing tag on posts they don't like in an attempt to silence them, and companies abuse it to try and cover up posts that badmouth them, giving mods a constant headache.

[non-contributing]

Re:Give me 15 minutes and I'll change your view of GDB (2015... by nocman on Saturday August 12, 2017 @10:10AM (#14997936)
If you are curious about why you are totally wrong, his comment was NOT unnecessary, and it DID add substance.

I had never heard of Mitch Hedberg, and therefore did not get the quote, and now I have enjoyed several clips of his comedy routines.

I agree with the pthreads, many people on HN are far too quick to hit the "that stuff is for reddit" button, and could definitely lighten up a bit.