News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:How I, a woman in tech, benefited from sexism in Silicon ... by norea-armozel on Friday August 11, 2017 @05:40PM (#14994552)
My comment was in reply to another comment which wasn't directly related to the letter that Damore wrote. I think you really need to read the comment I'm replying to before asserting anything else because I think you're confused. Try from the beginning and read.
Re:How I, a woman in tech, benefited from sexism in Silicon ... by needless2 on Friday August 11, 2017 @10:11PM (#14995982)
i did read that person's comment. Nobody else mentioned rape until you did.
Re:How I, a woman in tech, benefited from sexism in Silicon ... by norea-armozel on Monday August 14, 2017 @09:03AM (#15008288)
Yet my comment was about blaming victims. So can you admit you're an intellectually dishonest hack that should bow out now and get a job as a CNN contrarian talking head? I heard there's been some vacancies made.
Re:How I, a woman in tech, benefited from sexism in Silicon ... by needlessly2 on Monday August 14, 2017 @10:51AM (#15008979)
okay. stop throwing a tantrum because you were wrong
Re:How I, a woman in tech, benefited from sexism in Silicon ... by norea-armozel on Monday August 14, 2017 @11:02AM (#15009086)
Can you actually prove that I'm wrong or are you going to admit you're a liar? Because there's a big problem with your non-argument so far since you assume that the discussion isn't about victim blaming when the grandparent comment was victim blaming. So yeah, you need to really get your argument out and not latch onto the inconsequential things in my argument you don't like (like the tone or whatever). Either stand up and deliver an argument or go away.

Edit: Also down voting me won't make your argument correct.

Re:How I, a woman in tech, benefited from sexism in Silicon ... by needlessly2 on Monday August 14, 2017 @11:17PM (#15015106)
i'm actually not down voting you. However, other people are.