News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Ad blocking is under attack by xigency on Friday August 11, 2017 @11:32AM (#14990674)
I'm surprised no one has mentioned this alternative: disable JavaScript.

It's fairly easy in any browser to create a list of websites to ignore JavaScript on.

Re:Ad blocking is under attack by laurentdc on Friday August 11, 2017 @11:57AM (#14991018)
Doesn't disabling JavaScript these days pretty much break all websites? Or do you disable by default, then keep a whitelist?
Re:Ad blocking is under attack by ryandrake on Friday August 11, 2017 @01:24PM (#14992195)
To me, disabling JavaScript often tends to fix websites. I consider ads, animation, interactive menus, scroll-hijacking, malware, and auto-playing videos to be broken functionality.
Re:Ad blocking is under attack by YSFEJ4SWJUVU6 on Friday August 11, 2017 @12:37PM (#14991593)
Depends on what you define as “to break”. Of all the sites I use most remain very much usable even without scripting support, but certainly some functionality is often lost (whilst performance, on the other hand...)
Re:Ad blocking is under attack by neogodless on Friday August 11, 2017 @11:50AM (#14990900)
I see some disagreement with you, but I am somewhat of the opinion that I agree (though I don't think it's a great "common user" solution.)

ScriptSafe is running and I allow some sites, trust a few domains, and the rest get, at best, temporary access to run local JavaScript if specific content I want isn't loading. I get the feeling the majority of sites don't even function without JavaScript at this point, and some intertwine their ad system with other "necessary" JavaScript, so it's tough to surf the web without some hassle.

I don't think this is a perfect or even passable long-term mainstream solution.

Re:Ad blocking is under attack by bradleyankrom on Friday August 11, 2017 @11:39AM (#14990745)
doing so breaks an increasing number of sites. "so don't visit those sites" is the common response, and is fine as general policy, but sometimes isn't an option.
Re:Ad blocking is under attack by logfromblammo on Friday August 11, 2017 @11:55AM (#14990993)
I have noticed that blocking scripts makes the pages of most local television stations break.

But then I look at the list of 50 different domains blocked on the page, and I am not sorry--not one little bit. I don't really need to watch your little news video that badly. And I certainly don't want it to autoplay.

They are by far the worst offenders among sites I am likely to encounter frequently, as destination links from aggregators and social media. Newspaper sites are far more well-behaved with respect to their scripts, but also more likely to directly monetize the page view.

Re:Ad blocking is under attack by somebodynew on Friday August 11, 2017 @11:14PM (#14996244)
If disabling JavaScript allows you to circumvent copyright access controls, you're right back where you started ostensibly violating the DMCA.
Re:Ad blocking is under attack by turc1656 on Friday August 11, 2017 @12:24PM (#14991422)
Yep. I do it in a slightly different way. I have uMatrix installed as a browser add-on to help control for privacy, fingerprinting, security etc. But it can also be used for stuff like this. Simply disabling scripts on many sites' root domain and hitting refresh solves paywalls and adblock prevention on a fair amount of sites. For others it obviously doesn't work and nothing will load, but it works on more than you may expect.
Re:Ad blocking is under attack by boot13 on Friday August 11, 2017 @12:28PM (#14991483)
uMatrix rocks. It can take a few minutes of fiddling to get a complex site working, but it's totally worthwhile.
Re:Ad blocking is under attack by dvfjsdhgfv on Friday August 11, 2017 @11:42AM (#14990783)
It only works for some sites.