Bootstrap 4 Beta

Re:Bootstrap 4 Beta by philliphaydon on Friday August 11, 2017 @11:07AM (#14990405)

No Javascript is great. Bootstrap requires jquery, some making some events really hard to manage with react or angular. And react/angular bootstrap libraries are restrictive that it makes it hard to extend features of bootstrap.

All these issues go away with bulma.

No tool to customise theme is great. I don't want a bootstrap looking theme. It gets in the way... bootstrap is structure and styling throwing in the kitchen sink and half the house but not adding any doors or windows and you can't hide a builder to add more without it costing a kidney.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Bootstrap 4 Beta by SippinLean on Friday August 11, 2017 @11:10AM (#14990430)

>No Javascript is great

Then don't use the JS parts of BS?

>No tool to customise theme is great. I don't want a bootstrap looking theme.

These sentences are contradictory. The tool allows you to make a theme that doesn't look like everyone else's. Bulma does not have this option. You will end up with a "Bulma-looking" theme.

>It gets in the way

Unlike Bulma's visual styling? If you don't want a default-looking theme, wouldn't you need to customize it then? Doesn't lacking any tools to do so make this harder? I don't understand this argument.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Bootstrap 4 Beta by philliphaydon on Friday August 11, 2017 @11:55AM (#14990976)

Sometimes styling bootstrap is Super frustrating.

Same with foundation and semantic UI. Bulma and other small libraries are much more flexible in this regard.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Bootstrap 4 Beta by tracker1 on Friday August 11, 2017 @05:44PM (#14994583)

There are other toolkits for bootstrap that don't use the jquery based JS.. you can use anything, as long as the rendering uses the correct classes for a given state, etc.

[ Parent | on HN ]