Re:Bootstrap 4 Beta
by alfonsodev on Friday August 11, 2017 @01:08PM
(#14992025)
I found interesting the architecture of Google material design components, I still didn't try but I wonder if could solve those kind of problems that you mention.
>"bootstrap control that breaks stuff"
I like the idea of adapter more than having a separated framework like react-material design or react-bootrap.
https://material.io/components/web/docs/architecture-overvie...
Re:Bootstrap 4 Beta
by SippinLean on Friday August 11, 2017 @10:13AM
(#14989825)
>That's prob why you rarely see big complex sites using it.
What? Lyft, NASA, FIFA? Is there a list of major sites that are using Bulma? By your appeal to the bandwagon this makes it an inferior framework?
A basic grid and some buttons are nice for a pet site, it doesn't appear to be a robust enough framework for any site of significant size. I guess I could write the CSS and JS for a modal from scratch, or I could just install Bootstrap and never think about it again.
For creating a quick and dirty project it's great. But after a while you find you end up using less and less of bootstrap because moulding it to your requirements becomes a burden. That's prob why you rarely see big complex sites using it.
There's nothing worse than using react or angular and then someone pulls in a library to have a bootstrap control that breaks stuff and doesn't work and is hard to style. Spend hours trying to get it working properly beyond the most basic implementation of the control.
I prefer bulma because it focuses more on the basics and doesn't get in the way. Even after you create stuff you can shape and mould t easily.