News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Investigating a ten-year-old estimate that “most social p... by protomyth on Thursday August 10, 2017 @06:02PM (#14984759)
I often wish we in the US would separate out long-term medicine from insurance. It really violates any rational for insurance to have a continuous, known cost be part of that. Also, it ups the insurance cost for everyone else.

I wish we had a separate drug assistance program. Something like if you are making less than 200 or 300% poverty[1] the government will pay the full cost[2] and then just pro-rate it from there. Since we are talking long term drugs, its by definition something that would be applicable to preexisting conditions. I worry that it will not take the steps necessary to control fraud or run out of money like IHS.

1) http://familiesusa.org/product/federal-poverty-guidelines

2) obviously some upper limits apply https://www.medicaid.gov/medicaid/prescription-drugs/pharmac...

Re:Investigating a ten-year-old estimate that “most social p... by mobilefriendly on Thursday August 10, 2017 @07:41PM (#14985397)
> wish we had a separate drug assistance program.

Already exists.

https://www.medicaid.gov/medicaid/prescription-drugs/index.h...

Re:Investigating a ten-year-old estimate that “most social p... by protomyth on Thursday August 10, 2017 @07:59PM (#14985497)
I mean for everyone in the US not just those on Medicaid. Replacing insurance but still able to use Medical Savings Accounts to purchase my share of the drugs.
Re:Investigating a ten-year-old estimate that “most social p... by kerkeslager on Friday August 11, 2017 @10:22AM (#14989911)
This isn't even a good faith argument. You're well aware that most people aren't eligible for medicaid.