Outraged about the Google diversity memo?

Re:Outraged about the Google diversity memo? by mpweiher on Thursday August 10, 2017 @10:30AM (#14980034)

> current hiring policies

And he made it clear that he didn't think they were producing "false positives", so every woman hired was qualified.

> There are so many potential sources of preference

Yes. Biology is one.

> gender stereotypes

http://www.spsp.org/blog/stereotype-accuracy-response

[Stereotype Accuracy Is One Of The Largest And Most Replicable Effects In All Of Social Psychology]

> [verbal/math scores correlate for women] Sources

https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/rabble-rouser/201707/wh...

> the only way you're going to be competitive

> and not drag down the standard of my organization

> is by pairing up with another person

Huh??? Where did you get that from? Pleaaze.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Outraged about the Google diversity memo? by KirinDave on Thursday August 10, 2017 @11:14AM (#14980498)

Please excuse the delay. I'll get to breaking your links down shortly. You're asking me to source papers during my commute hour and on mobile it's difficult to grab and source the resources I'll cite.

[ Parent | on HN ]