Re:Outraged about the Google diversity memo?
by mistermann on Thursday August 10, 2017 @01:03PM
(#14981738)
> And some subjects don't have middle ground. Women being treated less than equal isn't a middle ground sort of issue.
Which is why you need to have ongoing discussion, to determine if people are or are not being treated less equally. People who believe they are "right" but are unable or unwilling to defend that position with words ("the debate is over") should not be trusted, ever.
Re:Outraged about the Google diversity memo?
by KirinDave on Thursday August 10, 2017 @02:23PM
(#14982597)
> People who believe they are "right" but are unable or unwilling to defend that position with words ("the debate is over") should not be trusted, ever.
So what you're saying is the debate is over about the intentions of people saying the debate is over?
Re:Outraged about the Google diversity memo?
by mistermann on Thursday August 10, 2017 @08:55PM
(#14985795)
Haha, that's a nice turn of words.
Well, assuming you're serious, what's your thoughts on that? Can we have any absolutes? Or is everything indeterminate? If nothing is knowable and communication is not possible shall we stop sending our children to school and go back to living in caves?
And some subjects don't have middle ground. Women being treated less than equal isn't a middle ground sort of issue.
There are already sides, there have been sides forever. People being pushed or pulled one way or another isn't a new phenomena. And there's no amount of public debate and middle ground treading you can do to prevent people who are going to be polarized as of the result of any backlash of their already fringe beliefs. That's inevitable. And the gymnastics required to keep them in the middle just aren't worth it. The actual goal is the thing of value for the people pushing for it. Not appeasing ignorance and bigotry just enough to keep them pacified.