Re:Show HN: Transformation Invariant Reverse Image Search
by alkoumpa on Thursday August 10, 2017 @07:44AM
(#14978696)
I wonder if only using non-overlapped triangles would reduce accuracy. Otherwise, it should limit the number of triangles.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Show HN: Transformation Invariant Reverse Image Search
by pippy360 on Thursday August 10, 2017 @09:36AM
(#14979454)
It would be great if I could remove overlapping triangles then I would have near linear growth of triangles for larger images. But it's very hard to come up with a technique which removes the same overlapping triangles (and leaves the same one) and is invariant to 2D affine transformations.
For example if you have 50 overlapping triangles you have to decide which 49 to remove and you have to remove the same 49 on the query image and the matching image. But because we want to be able to do our searches in sublinear time we can't compare the two images and decided on which triangles should stay/be removed, you have to do all that in preprocessing before inserting into the database/querying. delaunay triangulation looks almost perfect but isn't invariant to 2D affine transformations