Re:The Google memo isn’t sexist or anti-diversity, it’s science
by peoplewindow on Thursday August 10, 2017 @04:01AM
(#14977427)
If there was any evidence as to the utility of these things, then the argument might look rather different. But the memo - as you already know - states that Google management presents no empirical evidence in support of its policies, so it's reasonable to assume the firm doesn't have any evidence in either direction.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:The Google memo isn’t sexist or anti-diversity, it’s science
by Hnrobert42 on Thursday August 10, 2017 @10:32AM
(#14980058)
For what do you lack evidence? The value of diversity, the value of programs designed to increase diversity, or the value of the specific programs at Google?
Re:The Google memo isn’t sexist or anti-diversity, it’s science
by peoplewindow on Thursday August 10, 2017 @11:15AM
(#14980528)
Me personally? I don't care either way. The meta-debate is more important than gender studies.
Damore and Google? All three that you name.