Re:Ask HN: What are real Ruby on Rails alternatives in 2017?
by rubyfan on Wednesday August 09, 2017 @11:06PM
(#14975985)
Spring doesn’t seem as straightforward to me as I would hope. Play is similar, there is promise there but just too open ended.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Ask HN: What are real Ruby on Rails alternatives in 2017?
by scalesolved on Thursday August 10, 2017 @05:21AM
(#14977930)
Play is probably fine if you use Scala, the Java side is painful. I've worked with Play (Java version) for 3 years and we're moving to Spring Boot now, it's much simpler and stable (from a feature and framework perspective).
Re:Ask HN: What are real Ruby on Rails alternatives in 2017?
by rubyfan on Wednesday August 09, 2017 @11:42PM
(#14976146)
The funny thing I see on the springboot quickstart page:
Absolutely no code generation and no requirement for XML configuration
And the very next thing is a maven xml config.
Re:Ask HN: What are real Ruby on Rails alternatives in 2017?
by ivan_gammel on Thursday August 10, 2017 @01:48AM
(#14976817)
It's not a requirement to use Maven, so their statement is correct even in this extended sense. There's Gradle after all.
Re:Ask HN: What are real Ruby on Rails alternatives in 2017?
by rubyfan on Thursday August 10, 2017 @06:28AM
(#14978275)
Yes it’s just an ironic presentation.
Re:Ask HN: What are real Ruby on Rails alternatives in 2017?
by AlexAMEEE on Thursday August 10, 2017 @03:12AM
(#14977176)
By no XML, they mean that you don't have to do any configuration in xml files.
You can declare everything as a bean.
Example: // enabling ETAGS
@Bean
public Filter etagFilter() {
return new ShallowEtagHeaderFilter();
}
There is also the option to do many things in a yml file like you are used to from Rails.