News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Ask HN: What are real Ruby on Rails alternatives in 2017? by rubyfan on Wednesday August 09, 2017 @11:06PM (#14975985)
Spring doesn’t seem as straightforward to me as I would hope. Play is similar, there is promise there but just too open ended.
Re:Ask HN: What are real Ruby on Rails alternatives in 2017? by scalesolved on Thursday August 10, 2017 @05:21AM (#14977930)
Play is probably fine if you use Scala, the Java side is painful. I've worked with Play (Java version) for 3 years and we're moving to Spring Boot now, it's much simpler and stable (from a feature and framework perspective).
Re:Ask HN: What are real Ruby on Rails alternatives in 2017? by rubyfan on Wednesday August 09, 2017 @11:42PM (#14976146)
The funny thing I see on the springboot quickstart page:

Absolutely no code generation and no requirement for XML configuration

And the very next thing is a maven xml config.

Re:Ask HN: What are real Ruby on Rails alternatives in 2017? by ivan_gammel on Thursday August 10, 2017 @01:48AM (#14976817)
It's not a requirement to use Maven, so their statement is correct even in this extended sense. There's Gradle after all.
Re:Ask HN: What are real Ruby on Rails alternatives in 2017? by rubyfan on Thursday August 10, 2017 @06:28AM (#14978275)
Yes it’s just an ironic presentation.
Re:Ask HN: What are real Ruby on Rails alternatives in 2017? by AlexAMEEE on Thursday August 10, 2017 @03:12AM (#14977176)
By no XML, they mean that you don't have to do any configuration in xml files. You can declare everything as a bean.

Example: // enabling ETAGS

    @Bean
    public Filter etagFilter() {
        return new ShallowEtagHeaderFilter();
    }
There is also the option to do many things in a yml file like you are used to from Rails.