Re:uBlock Origin Maintainer on Chrome vs. Firefox WebExtensions
by agrahul on Wednesday August 09, 2017 @10:37PM
(#14975856)
The issue you linked is specific to the `about:` pseudo-protocol. uBO's WebExtensions version works as intended on the web.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:uBlock Origin Maintainer on Chrome vs. Firefox WebExtensions
by kasabali on Wednesday August 09, 2017 @10:40PM
(#14975866)
I know that, thanks. I posted it as a real life example of where webextensions are still not as powerful as the so called legacy extensions and wonder if that specific case still applies, is it fixed, planning to be fixed, or are there other specific examples where webextensions fall short.
Re:uBlock Origin Maintainer on Chrome vs. Firefox WebExtensions
by agrahul on Thursday August 10, 2017 @04:14AM
(#14977499)
Yeah, that specific case wasn't fixed; it appears that Mozilla doesn't intend to let addons run on `about:`. However, they did make `about:` respect DNT by disabling GA.
WebExtensions currently fall short when it comes to any addon that modifies the UI significantly (tree-style tabs etc), though it's been mentioned in some other comments here that they're talking to addon devs to extend the API where possible.
Re:uBlock Origin Maintainer on Chrome vs. Firefox WebExtensions
by snakeanus on Thursday August 10, 2017 @09:02AM
(#14979174)
> However, they did make `about:` respect DNT by disabling GA.
The irony is that since most people have DNT disabled having it enabled would make it easier for you to be tracked.
> it appears that Mozilla doesn't intend to let addons run on `about:`.
Why is that?