News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Kolmogorov option by macrael on Wednesday August 09, 2017 @02:08PM (#14971967)
Why then did that track so neatly with other scientific majors? There's no reason that you'd need the same number of aspiring typists as aspiring doctors.
Re:The Kolmogorov option by kbart on Thursday August 10, 2017 @03:30AM (#14977262)
I didn't check this data and you didn't provide a link, so can't comment on that, but do you honestly believe that women's position in 70s-80s were better than it is now? I seriously doubt that, just ask your mother or other older women for their opinion.
Re:The Kolmogorov option by macrael on Thursday August 10, 2017 @07:53PM (#14985462)
http://www.npr.org/sections/money/2014/10/21/357629765/when-...

This is the link I put up earlier. It is tracking women's enrollment in majors lined up with different fields. It shows the percentage of women enrolled in majors for programming tracking along with people enrolled in medicine, law, and the hard sciences until the 1980s where suddenly it deviated rather significantly.